SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Mad) 71

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Muruga Konar – Appellant
Versus
The Madurai Municipality through its Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
M. Natesan for Appellant.
P. Satyanarayana Raju for Respondent.

Judgment:-

This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by the appellant against the Madura Municipality for a permanent injunction restraining them from starting or laying or continuing any prosecution against the plaintiff for alleged trade in mutton in a stall in No.37, Khanpalayam First Street, Madurai. Both the Courts rejected the plaintiff’s claim. It is now contended in appeal that at any rate for the period from 17th November, 1947, to 31st March, 1948, the plaintiff preferred an application to the Municipal Commissioner, Madurai, under Exhibit A-15, asking for a grant of a licence for that period for the purpose of carrying on the business of a meat-stall. The reply rejecting the request is Exhibit A-16, dated 26th March, 1948. It says “Licence requested for a meat-stall at No.37, Khanpalayam First Street was refused as running of the trade in the premises will be prejudicial to the interests of public health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the locality.” Relying on sub-clause (11) of section 321 of the District Municipalities Act it is argued that as there has been a failure on the part of the municipality to communicate to the applicant within thirty days after t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top