SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 243

SOMASUNDARAM


Advocates:
K.S. Jayarama Aiyar and T. Anantha Babu for Petitioner.
N. Bapiraju for P.W. 1.
The Public Prosecutor (V.T. Rangaswami Ayyangar) for the State.

Order.-

This is a petition to quash the order of committal passed in P.R.C. No. 11 of 1952 on the file of the Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Rajahmundry. The circumstances under which this petition has been preferred are these: The petitioner herein as the guardian of his minor daughter filed a suit in O.S. No. 33 of 1948 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry, on the basis of a will said to have been executed by one Gunnamma. The will was filed along with the plaint. There was also a letter said to have been written by the two sons of Gunnamma confirming the will and it was also filed along with the plaint and the will. This suit was filed against the complainant in P.R.C. No. it of 1952 who was the first defendant in the suit. The defendant there claimed the properties under a settlement said to have been executed by one of the sons of Gunnamma. The defendant in his written statement attacked the will and the letter as forgery. The documents were sent to the Finger Print Expert as the will was only bearing the thumb impression of the testator. The petitioner herein, i.e., the father of the minor girl also gave evidence in support of the will. But after the opinion of the Fi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top