SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Mad) 17

SATYANARAYANA RAO, RAJAGOPALAN
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Coimbatore Division – Appellant
Versus
Sri Lakshmi Saraswathi Motor Service, Gudiyatham – Respondent


Advocates:
The Assistant Government Pleader (K. Veerasami) for Petitioner.
N.R. Govindachari for Respondent.

Satyanarayana Rao, J.-

On the facts of these cases, as found by the Tribunal these motor transport companies are not persons who could be described as “dealers” as defined by the Act, for they never carried on the business of buying or selling buses Their business was only the business of providing transport. As and when the buses became unserviceable or became useless they sold them either as old buses or scrap By reason of these isolated transactions they cannot be treated as dealers in buses within the meaning of the Act. Unless it is established that they are dealers, the application of the remaining provisions of the Act does not arise.

Each of these petitions is dismissed with costs Rs. 250.

R.M. ----- Petitions dismissed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top