SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 347

SATYANARAYANA RAO
J. Natesa Sastri – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Sundaram Chettiar (died) – Respondent


Advocates:
G.R. Jagadisan for Appellants.
T.R. Srinivasan for Respondents.

Judgment.-

This second appeal is by defendants 1 and 2 against the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonam affirming the decree granted in favour of the plaintiff by the District Munsiff setting side a claim order. The dispute-concerns the estate of one late Sivaramakrishna Ayyar and he became liable to pay costs to one Sivagangai Achi as per the decree in O. S. No. 40 of 1928, Sub-Court, Mayavaram. The present plaintiff obtained an assignment of that decree on 22nd October, 1931. Thereafter, the plaintiff applied to the Sub-Court, Mayavaram, for recognising the assignment in his favour and to transmit the decree for execution to the District Munsiff’s Court, Kumbakonam. By that time, the judgment-debtor died and his widow, Darmambal, was impleaded as the legal representative. The decree was transmitted to the District Munsiff’s Court, Kumbakonam, and the suit house was attached on 2nd April, 1942. Thereafter in E. A. No. 750 of 1942, the present defendants who are the sons of one Kuppalu Ammal, the sister-in-law of Sivaramakrishna Ayyar claimed that the property could not be attached as they obtained the property as a legacy under the will of the late Sivaramakrishna Ayyar














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top