SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 64

SUBBA RAO
Chandrabhogi – Appellant
Versus
Gudappa Bhandary – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Krishna Rao, G. Kamath and A.V. Narayana Pai for Petitioners.

Order.-

These are References under section 5 of the Court-Fees Act. O.S.. No. 201 of 1949 was filed on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of South. Kanara for division of the plaint B. Schedule immovable properties and C. Schedule movables into 16536 shares and for allotment to the plaintiff of 851 shares therefrom and to direct the first defendant to account for the income of the family properties realised by him and sale-proceeds of the clay sold by him from items 13 and 14 of the B. Schedule to defendants 99 to 102, and other incidental reliefs. The suit was valued in respect of the relief of partition at a sum of Rs. 100. On 30th July, 1952, the learned Subordinate Judge passed a supplementary preliminary decision whereunder defendants 1, 4 and 8 were directed to render accounts to the family for the sale-proceeds of clay realised by them and they were also made liable to pay the other members of the family their shares of Rs. 21,600 after deducting their own share. Defendants 1, 4 and 8 preferred separate appeals to the High Court. The appeal preferred by the first defendant is S.A. No. 3174 of 1953 and that by defendants 4 and 8 is S.R. No. 1257 of 1953. Both the M






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top