The plaintiff, who was unsuccessful in both the lower Courts, is the appellant in this second appeal. He sued to recover possession of the properties described in Schedule A, appended to the plaint, for an account of the management by the 1st defendant of the properties specified in Schedule B and of the sums received by him by sale of the properties as per Schedule C. The 2nd defendant is the father and the plaintiff is the son and they constitute members of a joint family. The 1st defendant is the brother-in-law, i.e., the sister’s husband of the 2nd defendant. The family of the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant was indebted to several people by 1930. On 12th December, 1930, the 2nd defendant and the plaintiff executed in favour of a third party a trust deed for discharging the debts of the family. After the lapse of two years, it was discovered that the trust created was not very useful to achieve the object and it was consequently cancelled on the 27th of August, 1932. On the 29th of August, 1932, three sales were effected by the father and the son to discharge certain debts. There yet remained several debts, which had to be discharged. Within three days after the cance