SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 34

GOVINDA MENON, BASHEER AHMED SAYEED
Puttayya – Appellant
Versus
Varanashi Subraya Hebbar – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Krishna Rao for Appellants.
S. Ramayya Nayak for Respondent.

Govinda Menon, J.-

In O.S.No.431 of 1935 on the file of the Court of the District Munsiff of Kandapur, a mortgage decree was passed by which the defendants therein were to pay a sum of money to the plaintiffs within a stipulated period in default of which a final decree had to be passed for sale of the mortgaged property. The defendants were members of a joint Hindu family of which the first defendant was the father and manager and defendants 2 and 3 were his two minor sons. The preliminary decree was passed on 30th November, 1935 and since no payment was made, a final decree Ex.B-2 was passed on 10th July, 1936. In pursuance of that final decree, the hypotheca was sold by public auction on 16th January, 1937 and the mortgagee decree-holder himself became the purchaser. Before the sale was confirmed, the first defendant Manjunatha Hebbar died on 23rd January, 1937. No steps were taken to declare that defendants 2 and 3 were the legal representatives of the first defendant and no attempt was made to appoint anybody as guardian ad litem of the minor defendants 2 and 3. But the sale was confirmed on 24th February, 1937, and the sale certificate Ex.P-3 dated 15th March, 1937, was issued













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top