SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Mad) 384

GOVINDA MENON
Alapati Subbarayudu – Appellant
Versus
Jallipalli Lakshmayya – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Rangachari for Appellant.
A.V. Krishna Rao for Respondent.

Judgment.-

In execution of the decree in O. S. No. 154 of 1931, against one Ramabrahmam, the appellant, who was the decree-holder, brought certain items of properties to sale, and in Court auction,.they were purchased by the respondent. The sale certificate shows that two items were sold in two separate lots, the first lot having been knocked down for Rs. 625 and the second lot for Rs. 1,340, the entire purchase money being Rs. 1,965. Subsequently, one Veerabrahmacharlu filed O. S. No. 156 of 1935 on the ground that this Ramabrahmam had no title to some of the properties sold. To that suit, the present respondent, who was the purchaser, was a party. The decision therein was that in the first lot, the judgment debtor Ramabrahmam, had not title and, therefore, the properties were delivered over from the possession of the respondent to the plaintiff therein. Thereafter, the present respondent-plaintiff, filed the suit out of which this second appeal arises, for the refund of the purchase money of lot No. 1 with interest thereon from the date when he paid the money, as well as the costs incurred by him in defending O.S. No. 156 of 1935.

The learned District Munsiff found that the plainti








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top