SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 91

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Fazl Ali and Vivian Bose, JJ.
Lachhman Singh and two others
Versus
The State
Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1950.
Decided On : 21 March 1952

Advocates:
Jai Gopal Sethi, Senior Advocate (R.L. Kohli, Advocate, with him) for Appellants.
Gopal Singh, Advocate, for Respondent.

Rule as regards admissibility of reassessing of evidence in a criminal appeal.

Headnote:Practice -Rule as regards admissibility of reassessing of evidence in a criminal appeal by Supreme Court.

       

Fazl Ali, J.- The three appellants were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge at Amritsar and found guilty of having murdered two persons named Darshan Singh and Achhar Singh and sentenced to transportation for life. The High Court of Punjab upheld their conviction and sentence and granted them a certificate under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution that the case is a fit one for appeal to this Court. Hence this appeal.

The facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows. On the evening of 16-12-1948, a little before sunset, Achhar Singh, one of the murdered persons, went to the house of one Inder Singh in village Dalam for getting paddy husked. Achhar Singh’s brother, Darshan Singh, who was working as a driver at Amritsar, came to Dalam from Amritsar the same evening, and, on coming to know from his father that Achhar Singh had gone to Inder Singh’s house, he also went there. While the two brothers were returning home, they were attacked by the three appellants and two of their relatives in a lane adjoining Inder Singh’s house. The five assailants, who were armed with deadly weapons, inflicted a number of injuries on the two victims, as a result of which they died then and there. After the murder, the appellants and their companions tied the two dead bodies in two kheses (wrappers) and took them to village Saleempura where two other persons, named Ajib Singh and Banta Singh, joined them, and the dead bodies after being dismembered were thrown into a stream known as Sakinala at a place about five miles from village Dalam. Bela Singh, father of the deceased persons, who was one of the persons who claims to have witnessed the occurrence, did not leave the village at night on account of fear, but he started about two hours before sunrise on the next morning and lodged the first information report at 10 a.m., at the nearest police station. A police officer arrived in village Dalam shortly afterwards, and, after investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against seven persons including the present appellants. At the trial, five of the accused were charged with offences under section 302 read with section 149 and under section 201 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, and the remaining two accused were charged with the offence under section 201 read with section 149 of that Code. The learned Judge who tried the accused, convicted the appellants and two other persons under section 302 read with section 149 of the Penal Code and sentenced them to transportation for life, and convicted Ajaib Singh under section 201 read with section 149 and sentenced him to three years’ rigorous imprisonment. Banta Singh, accused, was acquitted. On appeal, the Punjab High Court upheld the conviction of the present appellants and acquitted the remaining three persons.

Before proceeding to discuss the evidence in the case, it is necessary to refer to what has been described as the motive for the murder. It appears that in June, 1947, Natha Singh, father of the third appellant, Swaran Singh, was murdered, and Darshan Singh and Achhar Singh, the two murdered persons in the case before us, and their third brother Sulakhan Singh, were charged with the murder of that person. As a result of the trial, Darshan Singh was acquitted and Achhar Singh was sentenced to 1½ years’ rigorous imprisonment, while Sulakhan Singh was sentenced to 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment. The judgment of the Sessions Judge in that case was delivered shortly before the date of the present occurrence, and it is common ground that Achhar Singh, had been released on bail by the appellate Court and was at large at that time. It is said that the appellants and their relatives felt aggrieved by the acquittal of Darshan Singh and by the light sentence passed on Achhar Singh and therefore committed this murder in a spirit of frustration and revenge. It was conceded before us by the learned counsel for the appellants that the facts stated above constituted a strong motive for the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top