SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Mad) 407

PANCHAPAKESA AYYAR


Advocates:
A. Ramachandran instructed by Row and Reddy for Petitioner.
Santhanam for the Public Prosecutor (V.T. Rangaswamy Aiyangar) for the State.

Order.-

The petitioner is an approver, and neither an accused nor a mere witness. He was in remand when he was tendered a pardon as an approver and accepted it. So he must be detained in custody under section 337(3), Criminal Procedure Code, till the termination of the trial if committal ensues, or till the termination of the enquiry if committal does not ensue.

The fact that he is said to have turned hostile is immaterial. Approvers are “approvers” whether they are true to their word or turn hostile. Their character cannot be changed till the termination of the trial or enquiry in which they have been tendered and have accepted a pardon. They cannot throw away the pardon and get rid of their obligations like an advocate throwing away his brief. There are certain legal statuses like husband, wife, father, mother, son, approver, etc., which cannot be thrown away at will. As even the enquiry is not yet over, the approver must remain in detention, if committal ensues, the detention will be till the termination of the trial. That other accused have been let off on bail is immaterial as he is not an accused; that other witnesses are not detained in custody is immaterial as he is not a mer


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top