SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 208

RAMASWAMI GOUNDER


Advocates:
A. Subramaniam for Messrs Neti Subramanyam and K.V. Narasimha Rao for Petitioners.
The Public Prosecutor (V.T. Rangaswami Ayyangar) on behalf of the State.

Order.-

This is a Criminal Revision Case filed against the conviction and sentence of the Petitioners in C.A. No. 67 of 1951 on the file of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Bandar confirming the conviction and sentence in C.C. Nos. 70 to 76 of 1951 on the file of the Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Avanigadda.

The facts are:-

On 12th January, 1951, the Sub-Inspector of Police of Avanigadda approached the Stationary Sub-Magistrate of Avanigadda with a requisition Ex. P-2 in which he stated that he had reliable information that gambling on a large scale was going on in a common gaming house bearing door No. 21/4 in the fourth ward of Avanigadda belonging to Tangiralla Viswanadha Sastri and requested the issue of a search warrant to enable him to search the house. The Sub-Magistrate is stated to have put further questions also to the Sub-Inspector of Police as would justify him to issue the warrant and he is said to have after satisfying himself, issued a search warrant Ex. D-1. This search warrant was issued on 12th January, 1951. In pursuance of this warrant on 14th January, 1951, the Sub-Inspector of Police of Avanigadda accompanied by two Panchayatdars of whom one has been examined as P.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top