SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 23

SATYANARAYANA RAO
N. Thirumaleshwara Bhatta – Appellant
Versus
Balike Govinda Bhatta – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Krishna Rao for Appellant.
K.T. Adiga and K.P. Adiga for Respondents.

Judgment.-

The second defendant is the appellant in this appeal. The first plaintiff is the son of the first defendant They were members of a joint undivided Hindu family. On the 27th of April, 1938 (Ex. B-25) the father and the son executed a trust deed in respect of their family properties in favour of their family deity Shri Sankaranarayana Devaru constituting themselves trustees on behalf of the God. Thereupon the second defendant who was a creditor of the first defendant filed LP. No. 11 of 1930, Sub-Court South Kanara, on the 26th of July, 1938, Ex. B-25 to adjudicate the first defendant an insolvent The deed of trust was relied on as constituting an act of insolvency. On the 15th of November 1939, the first defendant was adjudicated an insolvent (Ex. B-27). The Official Receiver in whom the property became vested then filed R.L.A. No. 95 of 1940 to set aside the deed of trust under sections 4, 5, 53 and 54 of the Provincial Insolvency Act on the 10th January, 1940, Ex. B-28. The God was impleaded as a respondent represented by the first plaintiff as its trustee. The respondent was ex parte in that application and after examining one witness the trust deed was set aside as hay





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top