SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Mad) 319

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. P. V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Venkatarama Aiyar,JJ.
S. Ramakrishnaiah
Versus
The President, District Board, Nellore
C.M.P. No. 12219 of 1950.
Decided On : 19 October 1951

Advocates:
`K. V. Venkatasubramania Iyer for Row and Reddy for Petitioner.
The Advocate-General (V.K. Thiruvenkatachari) for the State Counsel {John and Row) for Respondents.

Right of freedom of association guaranteed under Article 19 of Constitution.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 19(1)(e) -Empowering the Director of Public Instruction to prohibit existence of and dissolve any heachers Union not constituted in accordance with the orders of Government if can be held as infringement of right of freedom of association guaranteed u/A 19(1)(e) of Constitution.

The Chief Justice.-The applicant in this case is a citizen of the Indian Union, a teacher by profession and employed as Junior Assistant, Board High School, Kurichedu, from 16th January, 1950 and from August, 1950, employed as Junior Assistant, Board High School, Singaroyakonda. An association called “The Andhra Rashtra Elementary Teachers’ Federation” was formed in 1947 with certain objects which related to educational and cultural advancement. One of the objects was to organise Taluk and District Teachers’ Unions and to affiliate them to the Federation. The applicant became a member of the Federation in 1947. He was elected as the Secretary of the Darsi Taluk Federation in the same year and in 1948 he was Joint Secretary of the Nellore District Federation, and in. 1949 he was elected as the Secretary of the main Federation itself. On or about 23rd April, 1950, the applicant was served with an order of the President, District Board, Nellore, which ran as follows:-

“It is learnt that the Nellore District Board Elementary School teachers noted in the margin are working as members and office-bearers of the Nellore District Elementary Teachers’ Federation and of the various Taluk Elementary Teachers’ Federations in the District as noted against their names. As the above associations are not the usual departmental associations, they ought not to have accepted the above posts without obtaining previous permission from the executive authority of the District Board. They are therefore directed to submit their explanations within a week from the date of receipt of this communication for not obtaining such previous permission. As it is objectionable to continue as members and office-bearers of the above unrecognised Federations, they are directed either to cease their connection with the said Federations at once or resign their appointments as District Board teachers and report the fact to this office by 30th April, 1950, the latest; failing which disciplinary action will be taken against them.

(Signed) N. Chenchurama Naidu,

President.”

The applicant states that this action was apparently taken by the District Board President in accordance with what was contained in G.O. Ms. No. 416, Education, dated 24th February, 1939 (printed as Appendix 5 at page 162 of the Madras Elementary Education Manual). The material portion of this order is as follows:-

“The Government consider that provision should be made for the departmental recognition of Elementary School Teachers’ Unions with a view to ensure their working on useful lines. They have accordingly framed the rules set out in the anexure to regulate the working of these Unions. The Director of Public Instruction is empowered to accord recognition to unions functioning in accordance with these rules and to forbid the existence of, and dissolve, any Teachers’ Union not conforming to these rules.

2. Teachers in Local Board/Municipal service should obtain the permission of the Board/Council concerned before forming unions and should apply to the Director of Public Instruction for recog-nition through the President of the District Board Executive Authority of the Council concerned.

3. Teachers in recognised elementary schools are prohibited from becoming members of teachers unions or other teachers’ organizations not constituted in accordance with the orders herein contained.”

Admittedly, neither the Federation nor any of the Unions of which the applicant is a member is a recognised union. The applicant states that he along with other teachers who were served with similar notices waited on deputation on the President in May 1950 and requested him to withdraw his order. On or about 17th August, 1950, the applicant was served with another order bearing date 8th August, 1950. It runs as follows:-

“The teachers noted in the margin have neither submitted their explanations nor even cared to submit replies till now. If no replies are received from them by 15th August, 1950, the latest, regular charges will be










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top