BASHEER AHMED SAYEED
Vedantam Narasimhacharyulu – Appellant
Versus
Pothuri Kotayya, Trustee of Sri Venugopalaswami and Anjaneyaswami temple, Valluru – Respondent
This revision petition is against the order of the learned District Judge of Guntur made on an application by the first respondent, under section 78 of the Hindu Religious Endowments Amendment Act as amended by (Act X of 1946).
The 1st respondent herein claiming to be the trustee of the Sri Venugopalaswami and Anjaneyaswami temple situate at Valluru, filed the application under section 78 of the Hindu Religious Endowments Act, to direct the petitioner and the other respondents to deliver possession of the petition schedule properties described in schedules A and B to him and respondents 20 and 21, the latter also being trustees appointed along with the 1st respondent petitioner in the lower Court.
The petitioner before me raised objections as to the tenability of the petition before the District Court on the ground that the case was not one covered by section 78 of the Hindu Religious Endowments Act and that the Court had no jurisdiction to direct delivery of possession of the properties to the trustees. A further ground was also alleged, viz., that the certificates required under section 78 was also not produced and that what was produced at a later stage was not the prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.