SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 82

SATYANARAYANA RAO, RAJAGOPALAN
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Messrs. Ratanshi Bhavanji, Adoni – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S. Rama Rao Sahib for Applicant.
K. Srinivasan for Respondent.

Satyanarayana Rao, J.- An interesting question has been referred to us for decision under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The question for decision is:

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the taxed share income of Rs. 22,440 from the unregistered firm of Messrs. Dharmashi Brothers, could be set off against the loss of Rs. 52,569 sustained by the respondent Hindu undivided family in speculation business for the purpose of determining the loss to be carried forward under section 24 (2).”

The assessee is the kartha of a Hindu undivided family. The kartha was also a partner in an unregistered firm known as Messrs. Dharmashi Brothers. During the assessment year, the assessee received as his share of the profit of the unregistered firm a sum of Rs. 22,440 on which tax was collected from the unregistered firm. His account of the total income of the loss as compiled by the Income-tax Officer is as follows: It would be seen from this statement that the family incurred a loss of Rs. 52,569 in speculation. This loss was set off by the Income-tax Officer-which was affirmed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner-against the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top