SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Mad) 30

P.V.RAJAMANNAR, PANCHAPAKESA AYYAR
Dr. M. Krishnamoorthy. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madras. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.T. Ramanujachari for Petitioner.

The Chief Justice.-The petitioner was employed as an Assistant District Health Officer in the Public Health Department of the Madras State and he acted as the Municipal Health Officer at Srivilliputtur from November, 1947, till about the middle of March, 1948. On complaints against him from the residents of the locality sent to the Director of Public Health and other authorities, there was first an enquiry by the District Health Officer and subsequently by an officer of the Crime Investigation Department. The Government finally referred the matter to the Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal for an enquiry. The Tribunal called upon the petitioner to show cause against certain charges which included a charge of corruption. The petitioner filed a written statement meeting the charges. The Tribunal proceeded with the enquiry, recorded evidence and submitted its report dated 31st October, 1949, to the Government. The Tribunal recommended that the petitioner may be removed from service. Government apparently did not agree that this was a sufficient penalty as, in their opinion, the charges were proved beyond doubt and therefore by order dated 3rd March, 1950, dismissed the petitioner from s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top