SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Mad) 73

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.P.V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Somasundaram, XJ.
K. Murugappa Chettiar.
Versus
C. Balasundaram Chetty.
C.M.P. No. 4564 of 1950.
Decided On : 22 February 1951

Advocates:
V. Srinivasan for Petitioner.
A. Narasimhachari and K.S. Narayana Aiyar for first Respondent.

Tenant can not be held default in making payment of rent.

Headnote:Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1946-Section 7 - eviction petition by landlord for default in payment of rent-Excess payment found with landlord on the basis of fixation of fair rent-Held, excess payment made by tenant saves tenant from being defaulter.

Order.-

There is no error of law apparent on the face of the order of the Appellate Tribunal, which directed eviction of the petitioner for default in payment of rent. The rent was payable daily and admittedly the petitioner did not pay or tender any rent after 29th August, 1949. As the rent was payable daily, the default would occur under section 7 of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1946, after the lapse of fifteen days in respect of every day’s rent. The only point pressed on us by petitioner’s learned counsel, is that, there was another application for fixation of fair rent and according to the rent fixed in that application the landlord would have with him sufficient money to discharge the arrears relating to the period of the alleged default. That may be so. But, that does not save the tenant from the consequence of the admitted default he has made. It is one thing to say that the tenant has a right to have the excess amount, on the basis of the fairent, adjusted towards the arrears; it is another thing to say that he can escape the consequences of not tendering or paying the rent on or before the date allowed under section 7 of the Act. This petition is therefore dismissed with costs.

V.S. ----- Petition dismissed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top