IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. P.V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Venkatarama Ayyar,JJ.
Janab N.S. Sattar Sahib
Versus
State of Madras, represented by the Secretary, Home Department, Fort St. George, Madras
Writ Petition No.276 of 1951.
Decided On : 25 September 1951
The question which now arises on an application taken out for a writ of mandamus by the party who was successful before the Government on the prior occasion is whether after the quashing of their order, the Government should take up the application filed before them under section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and rehear the same. We have no doubt whatever in the matter that when an order of the inferior tribunal on an application properly made to them is quashed by this Court by a writ of certiorari oh any ground which does not deal with the merits of the case, it is not only permissible, but it is also incumbent on the inferior tribunal to take up the application and rehear the same. The learned Advocate-General appearing for the State very properly admitted this position and stated that the Government was prepared to deal with the application before them in the light of the judgment of this Court. In these circumstances it is not necessary to grant a mandamus as pointed out by Lord Goddard, C.J., in the recent judgment in Rex v. Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal1. The learned Chief Justice says:
“Once the order is quashed it follows that the applicant will be able to go back to the appeal tribunal.”
In this case, once the order of the Government is quashed the applicant will be able to go back to the Government acting under section 64-A.
K.S. ----- Application dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.