VENKATARAMA AYYAR, P.V.RAJAMANNAR
Koypathodi Moidin Kutty (died) – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Doraiswami Aiyar – Respondent
“The decree-holder is reported dead. No sale taken place. Petition closed. No.L.R. impleaded”.
Meantime a suit had been instituted for partition of the properties belonging to the tarwad of the decree-holder, O.S.No.32 of 1941, on the file of the bub-Court Kozhikode. In that suit a receiver was appointed on 27th March, 1945, for the tarwad properties and it is common ground that the decree in O.S.No.6 of 1936 is one of the properties covered by the receivership order. On 16t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.