SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Mad) 207

CHANDRA REDDI, SATYANARAYANA RAO
Kora Bala Tripurasundara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Ratala Kotayya – Respondent


Advocates:
G. Venkatarama Sastri for Appellant.
P.V. Chalapathi Rao for Respondent.

Satyanarayana Rao, J.-The plaintiff is the appellant in this appeal. His suit for a declaration of title and possession of plaint B schedule properties was dismissed by the lower Court.

The property in suit originally belonged to one Govindu who died on 5th October, 1897, leaving behind him his widow Veeramma and two daughters Peda Kanakamma and China Kanakamma. Veeramma died on the 19th April, 1909 and according to the plaintiff’s case, the inheritance was divided between the two daughters in 1910. Peda Kanakamma was married to Bollayya, the father of the defendant. She died in 1913. China Kanakamma who is still alive surrendered the estate under a deed of surrender of 14th August, 1946-Exhibit A-1-to her son, the plaintiff. The plaintiff sues in this suit to recover possession of half of the inheritance of his maternal grandfather which came into possession of Peda Kanakamma by virtue of the partition of 1910 after the death of Veeramma and which continued in the possession of Bollayya, the husband of Peda Kanakamma and after his death with the defendant. The plaintiff’s case regarding the possession of Bollayya was, as stated in paragraph 4 of the plaint is that though after the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top