The Chief Justice.-There are no merits in this application. There was an application for eviction of the petitioner from the premises of which he was in occupation and he failed in both the Courts. In execution of the order of eviction it turned out that the premises of which the petitioner is admittedly in occupation and which admittedly belongs to the landlord was given a wrong door number. So, the landlord filed an application for amendment of the description of the property by correcting the door number. The learned Subordinate Judge, who was the Appellate Tribunal, has directed an amendment of the petition, the order of the lower Court and the order of the Appellate Tribunal. This application is to quash this order.

It was contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the application was made under section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code which did not apply and also that the landlord should have approached the Rent Controller and not the Appellate Tribunal for an amendment, even assuming that he was entitled to that relief. We see no substance in either of these contentions. It may be that section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code by itself does not apply to proceeding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document