SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 335

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Appat Krishna Poduval – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Nethiar – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P. Ramakrishna Aiyar for Petitioner.
N.R. Seska Aiyar for Respondent.

Judgment

The 10th defendant in O.S. No. 543 of 1933 on the file of the District Munsif’s Court, Ottapalam, is the petitioner. O.S. No. 543 of 1933 was filed by the respondents who are jenmies for recovery of Michavaram against some of the defendants who are the kanomdars. The respondents represented two thavazhis, the tarwad consisting of three branches. The other thavazhi is represented by the other defendants. A simple mortgage decree was passed in favour of the plaintiffs on 9th August, 1934. The final decree was passed on 27th July, 1935. E.P. No. 1277 of 1935 was filed by the plaintiffs for bringing the property to sale and a commissioner was appointed to report as to the survey numbers and the property that was sought to be sold and in his report it is stated that the parties are not at issue in respect of items 1 and 4 of the schedule to the decree. In E.P. No.1277 of 1935, an order was made directing the plaintiffs to have the survey numbers given in the decree and the plaint corrected, and that the sale proclamation to mention the correct survey numbers and measurements. The application was disposed of by this order and the corrections were not included in the sale proclama














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top