SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Mad) 46

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Doraiswami Goundan – Appellant
Versus
Subramania Mudaliar – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Desikan for Petitioner.
P.S. Balakrishna Aiyar and P.S. Ramachandran for Respondent.

Judgment

The question for decision in this Revision Petition is whether the Government is a necessary party to the suit.

The Suit O.S. No. 193 of 1948 was instituted for a declaration that the resumption proceedings and the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode, and the District Collector, Coimbatore, with reference to the suit property were null and void and that they would not affect the plaintiff’s right, tide and enjoyment of the suit lands or alternatively for declaring that the inam in the suit land was only of the melwaram and that it could alone be resumed and regranted to the defendant. The suit was contested and one of the issues which was tried as a preliminary issue is “whether the Government is a necessary party to the suit.” The lower court held that the Government was a necessary party and hence this revision petition by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s case is that the defendant applied to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode, under section 44-B of the Hindu Religious Endowments Act for resumption of the suit land on the ground that it was a service inam granted to his forefathers and the reason for the resumption was that the plaintiff was his lessee for many


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top