SOMASUNDARAM
Marupaudi Kutumba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Parvathaneni Venkataramayya – Respondent
The three second appeals arise out of three suits filed by the appellants to recover damages from the respondent defendant for malicious prosecution. The defendant is the same in all the three suits.
In respect of an occurrence on 21st May, 1942, the defendant filed a complaint against the appellants and others for offences under sections 148, 149, 323, 324 352 and 504, Indian Penal Code. A prima facie case was made out, and so a charge was framed by the Magistrate against appellants and others for offences under sections 323 and 324, Indian Penal Code. The accused then entered upon their defence and examined defence witnesses. The Magistrate, after considering the defence evidence, acquitted the appellants. The appellants thereupon instituted the suits in the Court of the District Munsif, Vijayawada, for damages for malicious prosecution.
It may be mentioned, the appellants in S.A. No. 793 of 1947 filed a complaint against the defendant, alleging that the defendant and others came and beat him on 21st May, 1942, at about 4 p.m. There were thus two complaints one by the defendant against the appellants in the second appeals, and the other by the appellant in S.A. No. 783 of 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.