SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Mad) 96

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Machireddi Narappa – Appellant
Versus
Proddatur Subbarayudu – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V. Ramanarasu for Appellant.
A. Bhujanga Rao and D.R. Krishna Rao for Respondent.

Judgment

This Civil Miscellaneous second appeal arises out of proceedings taken in execution of a final mortgage decree. The petitioner is the son of the judgment-debtor. The final decree was passed on 25th July, 1932. The decree-holder died after the final decree and his son, one Lingasubbayya, appears to have filed three execution petitions, the first on 21st January, 1935, the second on 20th January, 1938 and the third on 31st January, 1941. The third execution application was dismissed on 21st February, 1941. Lingasubbayya’s sons filed an execution petition on 29th January, 1944, which was also dismissed on 24th February, 1944. They again filed the present execution petition, E.P. No. 366 of 1944, on 24th July, 1944, just a day previous to the expiry of the 12 years’ period from the date of the final decree.

The present execution petition was signed and verified by Lingasubbayya’s sons and was also countersigned by one Mr. C.S. Narasimhachariar as vakil for the decree-holder, Veerasubbayya. Mr. Narasimhachariar had no vakalat for Lingasubbayya’s sons, the legal representatives of the decree-holder. Mr. Narasimhachariar’s son, Mr. Srinivasachariar, however, who was working with hi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top