LORD REID, LORD RADCLIFFE, LORD MACDERMOTT, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR
Lumbhardar Zutshi – Appellant
Versus
The King – Respondent
Lord Reid.-On 19th June, 1946, the appellants were convicted and sentenced by the Chief Presidency Magistrate,
Bombay. The charge against the 1st appellant was that he, being a public servant, accepted a sum of Rs. 15,000 for
forbearing to prosecute a metal merchant named Vakharia and thereby committed an offence punishable under section
161 of the Indian Penal Code. The 2nd appellant was charged with abetting that offence. An appeal by the 1st appellant
to the High Court at Bombay was dismissed on 20th March, 1947. It appears from the judgment of Stone, C.J., that
there were two grounds of appeal: first that the whole proceedings were invalid because no sanction had been given
under section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code and secondly an appeal on the facts. The 2nd appellant did not
appeal to the High Court, but notice of enhancement of sentence was given to him and his sentence was increased on
20th March, 1947. On 21st April, 1947, a petition for special leave to appeal was lodged by the 1st appellant. In this
petition no reference was made to anything which had occurred before 15th March, 1944, when the charge against the
appellant was framed by the Chief Presidency
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.