H.J.KANIA, S.FAZL ALI, MEHRCHAND MAHAJAN, B.K.MUKHERJEA
Thota China Subba Rao and nine others – Appellant
Versus
Mattapalli Raju and twelve others – Respondent
On the 2nd January, 1914, the mortgagor acting for himself and as the guardian of his undivided minor son granted a mortgage of 51.20 acres of Inam lands along with other lands (which need not be hereafter referred to as they were later on disposed of by consent of parties) to secure a sum of Rs. 30,000 lent by the mortgagees. In respect of the suit lands it was a non-possessory mortgage. On the 27th November, 1915, he executed another mortgage with possession of the suit lands for Rs. 4,000, but as the lands were in the occupation of the lessees under a lease for 15 years from F.1320 to 1334 (1910-11 to 1924-25) at an annual rent of Rs. 1,000 it was stipulated that the mortgagees were to receive the rent from the lessees and to take possession of the lands on the exp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.