SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Mad) 45

GOVINDA MENON
The Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
Dhanushkodia Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
The Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.S. Sivakaminathan) for Appellant.
N.G. Krishna Aiyangar for Respondent.

Judgment

This is an appeal by the Provincial Government against the acquittal of the two respondents for offences under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The first respondent who was the driver of pleasure car No. 1487, was charged under section 3(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act in that he drove a motor vehicle in a public place without an effective licence issued to him authorising him to drive the vehicle; and the second respondent was charged under section 5 of the same Act which states that no owner, or person in charge of a motor vehicle, shall cause, or permit any person who does not hold an effective licence, to drive the vehicle. The Sub-Magistrate of Tiruchendur found that the respondents did not commit any offence and acquitted both of them.

On 10th March, 1949, at about 10-30 p.m., P.W.2 found the first respondent driving the motor vehicle in question along the road from Tiruchendur to Kurumbur and the owner, the second respondent, was in the car. When directed to produce the driving licence, the first respondent was unable to do so because he did not, at that time, possess a licence. His case was that he had an effective licence which is marked as Ex. P-1 valid up to 11th Januar



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top