SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 249

SOMASUNDARAM
The Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
K. Sinnappa – Respondent


Advocates:
The Public Prosecutor (V.L. Ethiraj), Appellant in person.
P. Suryanarayana for Respondents.

Judgment

This is an appeal by the Public Prosecutor against the acquittal of the accused in 45 cases tried by the Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Alur.

Forty-five cases were put up against 45 different accused for offences under the Prohibition Act. On 15th November, 1947, there was a general raid by the officers of the Prohibition party as a result of which the several accused were put up for trial. The Magistrate tried these cases separately but at the defence stage clubbed them all together and finally acquitted them.

It is contended by the Public Prosecutor that the clubbing together at the defence stage is illegal and on that main ground seeks to set aside the order of acquittal. The Magistrate should have made up his mind whether to try them all together or not before the commencement of the cases. Not having done so then it is not open to club these cases after the evidence of the witnesses were recorded and at the defence stage. The order of acquittal is therefore set aside.

The next question is whether re-trial of the accused should be ordered. The offence was on 15th November, 1947, and at this distance of time and in view of the fact that the accused have been put to considerable


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top