SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Mad) 111

GOVINDA MENON, KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU


Advocates:
N.S. Mani for Row and Reddy for Petitioner.
The Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.S. Sivakaminathan) for the Public Prosecutor for the State.

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.-This revision petition raises a question of some importance regarding the venue of trials in criminal cases. The petitioner, a communist detenu in the Central Jail, Vellore, was charged along with others for alleged offences of causing simple hurt, etc., to the jail officials on 3rd August, 1949, within the precincts of the said jail while the jail officials were acting in the discharge of their official duties. As many as 23 charge sheets were filed against this detenu with regard to the alleged occurrence. In pursuance of a request by the Inspector-General of Prisons, Madras, that the trial of the petitioner and the other connected cases may be held in the recreation room of the Central Jail, Vellore, to which the public can be given access, the Government agreed to the proposal and directed the trial of the abovementioned cases as suggested by the Inspector-General of Prisons. The District Magistrate, after obtaining the approval of the High Court, Madras, issued a notice that the cases would be heard by him in the recreation room of the jail premises. The petitioner, thereupon, applied to the District Magistrate, North Arcot at Chingleput that the case s
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top