1950 Supreme(Mad) 215
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. P.V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Viswanatha Sastri and Mr. JusticeSomasundaram.
Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan
Versus
The State of Madras, represented by the Chief Secretary
C.M.P. Nos. 5255 and 5340 of 1950.
Decided On : 27 July 1950
V.V. Srinivasa Aiyangar, N.R. Raghavachariar and V. Devarajan for Petitioner in C.M.P. No. 5255 of 1950.
Alladi Krishnaswami Aiyar for N. Rajagopala Aiyangar and V. Sethuraman for Peti tioner in C.M.P. No. 5340 of 1950.
The Advocate-General (K. Kuttikrishna Menon) instructed by the Government Solicitor on behalf of the respondent in both the petitions.
Violation of fundamental rights
Headnote:Constitution of India-Articles 15 and 29(2) -Fundamental rights-Violation of fundamental rights Madras Communal Government Order relating to admission in colleges.
In C.M.P. No. 5340 the petitioner is one C.R. Srinivasan. In his affidavit he states that he has passed the Intermediate Examination of the Madras University held in March, 1950, in Group I taking Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry as his optionals in the first class and obtained for a maximum of 450 marks in the optionals 369 marks; that he has filed an application for admission to the Engineering College at Guindy, that he learns that the admission in the Engineering College is governed by a Government Order whereby admission is governed by communal proportion (the order already referred to in the previous Civil Miscellaneous Petition), that he apprehends that there is no prospect of his application being considered on its merits with due regard to his qualifications, ignoring considerations of race, caste or religion. The petitioner contends that the said Government Order is inconsistent with Article 15 and Article 29(2) of the Constitution and prays that the Government may rescind the Order and direct the Committee appointed to select the candidates for admission into the Engineering College to consider his application for admission on its relative merits without reference to considerations of religion, race, caste, language or any of them and to dispose of the same in accordance with the terms of Articles 29 (2) and 15 of the Constitution.
On behalf of the State of Madras counter-affidavits were filed in the two petitions setting forth practically the same legal contentions. In the counter-affidavit filed in C.M.P. No. 5255 of 1950 it is stated that the total number of seats available in th