The Chief Justice.-This is an appeal by the plaintiffs against the decree and judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Vijayawada in O.S. No. 70 of 1943 on the file of his Court, in so far as it is against them. To understand and appreciate the contentions of the parties to this appeal, it is necessary to state the following facts which are either undisputed or well established. Raja Bommadevara Naganna Nayudu and the defendant who is the respondent before us are brothers and were members of an undivided Hindu family. The defendant filed a suit for partition of the joint family properties against his brother Naganna Nayudu in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Eluru (O.S. No. 38 of 1919). A preliminary decree for partition was passed on 29th January, 1921 and eventually the final decree was passed on 30th November, 1929. Each of the brothers was allotted a half share in the family properties. The suit lands were accretions to the main land comprised in the joint family estate formed in the river Krishna. The Government entered on these lands in 1894 under the provisions of the River Conservancy Act. Both the brothers and their father filed a suit (O.S. No. 83 of 1916) on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Masulipatam against the Government and obtained a decree for recovery of a portion of the accretions which had become fit for cultivation. This decree was confirmed by the High Court in A.S. No. 372 of 1917. In the meantime there were other accretions of which a part was delivered over to the brothers by the Government. The Zamindar of South Vallur, a cousin of Naganna Nayudu and the defendant, filed O.S. No. 9 of 1921 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Vijayawada (tried subsequently as O.S. No. 50 of 1923 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada) against the two brothers and the Government claiming that the accretions belonged to the South Vallur estate. That suit was decreed by the lower Court and in accordance with the decree the Government delivered to the plaintiff in that suit, the Zamindar of South Vallur, 96 acres 48 cents of such accretions. An appeal was preferred by the brothers against the said decree to the High Court (A.S. No. 327 of 1924) and this Court reversed the decision of the Court below and declared the right of the two brothers to the said accretions. In spite of this appellate decree, the Zamindar of South Vallur continued to be in the possession of the lands delivered to him by the Government and purported to divide the same with his son. So, the defendant in the present action filed two suits O.S. No. 9 of 1925 and O.S. No. 35 of 1925, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Vijayawada for recovery of possession of the said lands together with mesne profits. O.S. No. 9 of 1925 was filed for possession of that portion of the property in the possession of the senior Zamindar of South Vallur and others claiming through him, which fell to his share at the partition between him and his son. O.S. No. 35 of 1925 was filed against the junior Zamindar of South Vallur who was then a minor represented by the Court of Wards in respect of the portion which fell to his share. The Government was made a party to both the suits. In both the suits Naganna Nayudu was impleaded as the second defendant. After the declaration of the rights of the brothers in A.S. No. 327 of 1924 by this Court, the two suits were decreed on 30th November 1929, in favour of the two brothers. The decree directed delivery of possession of the properties to the two brothers and left the question of mesne profits to be determined afterwards. On 4th December, 1930, the defendant filed two applications, I.A. Nos. 142 and 143 of 1931 in the two suits respectively for ascertaining the mesne profits as per the direction in the judgment and decree in the two suits. The Court ascertained and passed a decree in O.S. No. 9 of 1925 for certain amounts aggregating to Rs. 10,413-4-7 with interest against the property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document