SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 47

RAGHAVA RAO
A. Krishnaraya Kodgi – Appellant
Versus
A. Sarvothama Kodgi – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Krishna Rao for Appellant.
K.Y. Adiga and K.P. Adiga for Respondents.

Judgment

The question for decision in this second appeal is one of construction of a deed of gift, Ex. P-2, executed on 20th March, 1918, by the first defendant, appellant before me, in favour of the second defendant, the Indian section of the Theosophical Society, Benares, represented by its General Secretary at the time, for the use and benefit of the local lodge at Coondapur. On 6th October, 1942, finding the suit property no longer required for the use and benefit of the local lodge which apparently had by that time ceased to exist and basing itself on the clause of reverter contained in Ex. P-2 the second defendant by its General Secretary at the time executed a deed of sale of the suit property in favour of the first defendant. The plaintiff, the first respondent before me, sued in the Court of the District Munsiff of Coondapur for recovery of possession of the entire subject-matter of the gift deed but succeeded in obtaining a decree for only a half which was later confirmed on appeal by the learned Subordinate Judge of South Kanara.

The first defendant appeals to this Court against the appellate decision, urging as he did in the courts below, firstly that the suit must be reg












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top