SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 222

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Bhagavatula Gopalakrishnamurthi – Appellant
Versus
Dhulipalla Sreedhara Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
P.V. Chelapathi Rao for Petitioners.
V. Suryanarayana for Respondents.

Judgment

Petitioners are defendants 14 and 22 in O.S. No. 59 of 1945 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali. The suit was for partition and for possession after setting aside certain alienations. The defendant is the father of the plaintiffs. He was adjudicated insolvent and the Official Receiver was made a party to the suit. The suit relates to the setting aside of alienations not only made by the father but also by the Official Receiver and paragraph 5 of the plaint states:

“There was no proper vesting order passed in favour of the Official Receiver. Neither the half share of the first plaintiff nor the father’s power to sell the same was or could be vested in the Official Receiver in I.P. No. 33 of 1930. The latter could if at all deal with the first defendant’s half share. The Official Receiver sold the insolvent’s right, title and interest in the properties mentioned as items 6 to 17 of Schedule B without covenanting for the existence or extent of the title of the insolvent..... These defendants did not acquire title to any more than the half share of the first defendant.”

During the pendency of the suit, the Provincial Insolvency Act was amended by the additi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top