SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(Mad) 313

RAJAGOPALAN
Ramachandra Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Kandasami Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Desikan for Petitioner.
P.S. Sarangapani Aiyangar for Respondent.

Judgment

In a preliminary decree in a suit for partition the decree of the trial Court provided,

“that the plaintiff be entitled to a half share in the plaint A schedule items 1 to 5 described hereunder on payment into Court within six months from this date Rs.1,102-5-0 with interest thereon at six per cent. per annum from the date of plaint, that is, 15th September, 1943, till payment.”

The amount was not paid within the period of six months from the date of the decree of the trial Court. There was an appeal against that decree and that appeal was finally disposed of on 28th June, 1946. Within six months of the date of the appellate decree the plaintiff deposited the amount into Court, and applied in I.A.No.386 of 1946 for permission to deposit the amount due under the preliminary decree which was confirmed on appeal into Court and the learned Subordinate Judge granted a week’s time from the date of the Order, 8th January, 1947. That Order, the first defendant, petitioner, seeks to set aside in revision.

The main contention of the petitioner wat that the Court had no jurisdiction to extend the time fixed in the decree, that is, six months from the date of the preliminary decree of the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top