SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 250

HORWILL, BALAKRISHNA AYYAR
Nishtala Subrahmanya Somayajulu – Appellant
Versus
Kannepalli Lakshmi Somi Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V. Ramanarasu for Appellant.
P. Somasundaram and P. Suryanarayana for Respondent.

Judgment

Balakrishna Ayyar, J.-The appellant is the brother of the respondent. Both of them are the children of one Anandaraya Sastri, who was a Sub-Inspector of Police and a subscriber to the General Provident Fund. He nominated his wife, Satyavathamma, to receive the amount standing to his credit in the provident fund in the event of his dying before the money was paid over to him; but Satyavathamma predeceased him. She died in August, 1938, while Anandaraya Sastri survived till 8th March, 1946. The appellant applied for a succession certificate in the Court of the District Judge of Vizagapatam. The respondent who is his sister opposed the application claiming that she was entitled to the money. The learned Judge dismissed the application of the appellant and directed that a succession certificate should be issued in favour of the respondent. Hence this appeal.

Note 2 to rule 17 of the rules regulating the General Provident Fund as they stood in 1926 provided,

“when a person named in a Form of Declaration dies before the subscriber, the Declaration shall, in the absence of a direction to the contrary in the Form of Declaration, become null and void in respect of that person......”

It












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top