SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Mad) 297

CHANDRA REDDI
Shah Shantilal and Co. – Appellant
Versus
T. E. Shiborwalla – Respondent


Advocates:
Y. Balakrishnayya for Petitioner.
Subramanyam and Rajagopal for Respondent.

Judgment

This is a revision petition filed by the defendant against the order of the Second Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Madras, dismissing an application to set aside an ex parte decree passed on 26th August, 1948. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant residing in Bombay for recovering a sum of Rs. 636 being the amount due to him in respect of goods sold and delivered to the defendant. The suit stood posted to 4th August, 1948 for hearing, and summons was taken out by the plaintiff but it was not served on the defendant till 2nd August, 1948. On that date the defendant seems to have sent a telegram to the office of the Registrar of the Court of Small Causes, requesting the Court to grant him time; but this does not seem to have been brought to the notice of the Court on 4th August, 1948, to which date the case was fixed for hearing. Since the summons was not returned, it was directed that substituted service should be effected upon the defendant, and the case was posted to 26th August, 1948, for final hearing. As the defendant did not appear and contest the suit on that day a decree was passed ex parte for a sum of Rs. 636-4-0.

The defendant filed an application on







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top