Judgments: Govinda Menon, J.-

Letters Patent Appeal No.61 of 1949 is against the judgment of Panchapagesa Sastri, J. in C.M.A.No.648 of 1946 and Letters Patent Appeal No.62 of 1949 is against the judgment of the same judge in C.M.A. No.649 of 1946 C.R.P.No.66 of 1946 is against the order of the Subordinate Judge of Masulipatnam in S.C.S.No.62 of 1943 on his file. The two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and the revision petition were heard together by the learned Judge who pronounced judgment in the civil miscellaneous appeals which is reported in Suryanarayana v. Venkatadu 1 . The common judgment shows that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were dismissed with costs, whereas the revision petition was adjourned for final orders to a later date. Before final orders were passed in the Revision Petition, the Letters Patent Appeals were filed against the judgment in those Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and all the three have been heard together. By an order, dated 31st October, 1952, the learned Chief Justice and Venkatarama Ayyar have referred the matter to a Full Bench and that is how these appeals have come up before the Full Bench as constituted. As the facts have been set forth in the judgme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document