SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 64

CHANDRA REDDI
Kannaganti Suryanarayanamurthi – Appellant
Versus
Pidugu Rama Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
N.V.B. Sankara Rao for Appellants.
R.Venkatasubba Rao and A.Ranganayakulu for Respondents.

Judgment.-

The respondent herein filed a suit in the Court of the District Munsiff of Tenali for a declaration that they have exclusive right to hold the lighted torch, Sannidhikola, inside the chariot during the Radhotsavam of Sri Agasthis-waraswami at Nandivelugu and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their right. The basis of the suit was that, ever since the inauguration of the car festival, the ancestors of the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs have been exercising exclusive right of holding the lighted torch inside the chariot and that this right was being exercised till they were obstructed by the defendants in the year of 1945.

The suit was resisted by the defendants, who are the trustees of the temple mainly on two grounds. The exclusive right of the plaintiffs to hold the Sannidhikola was denied and it was also pleaded that the suit was not cognisable by a civil Court as the right claimed related only to a religious honour or dignity.

The trial Court, while holding that the plaintiffs have proved their exclusive right to hold the lighted torch, though for a few years before the institution of the suit they did not exercise this right, dis





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top