SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 269

SATYANARAYANA RAO, KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Varadarajan – Appellant
Versus
Muthu Venkatapathi Reddi – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Jagathisa Aiyar for Appellant.
R. Gopalaswami Aiyangar for Respondent.

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.-

In O.S.No. 20 of 1937 on the file of the District Court of South Arcot a mortgage decree was passed on 6th January, 1939, for a sum of Rs. 3,540-15-4, the mortgagors being the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant being his minor son represented by the father 1st defendant as guardian-ad-litem. One Muthu Venkatapathi Reddiar as the assignee-decree-holder brought the mortgaged property to sale, the sales having been held on the 11th and 12th September, 1944, and three persons Mahadeva Goundan, Natesa Goundan and Swami Kannu Goundan and the decree-holder purchased the property at the auction. M. P. No. 302 of 1944 was filed on behalf of the minor second defendant for setting aside the sale under Order 21, rule 90 and section 47, Civil Procedure Code, mainly on the ground that there was no proper advertisement and publication of the sale and that the property which was of the value of about Rs. 16,000 fetched a low price of about Rs. 6,442. Sufficient security in immovable properties was furnished on behalf of the 2nd defendant-petitioner and during the pendency of the petition the 2nd defendant having become a major he was declared a major and he elected to proc
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top