SATYANARAYANA RAO, RAJAGOPALAN
V. Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
The Ceded District Auto Transport Co. , Ltd. , Kurnool, represented by its Managing Director at Kurnool – Respondent
This Letters Patent Appeal is against the judgment of our learned brother, Subba Rao, J., setting aside the order of the Government and that of the Central Road Traffic Board and allowing writ petition No. 282 of 1951 to quash the orders. The only question, that was debated before him and now before us, is whether there was a right of appeal to the Central Road Traffic Board against the order of the Regional Transport Authority dated 31st August, 1950, refusing to grant the application of the appellants to extend the route of the bus service from Atmakur to Velgode. The learned Judge held that the appeal was incompetent, that therefore the order of the Central Road Traffic Board extending the permit in favour of the appellants to Velgode was without jurisdiction, and that the order passed by the Government in the exercise of their revisional jurisdiction confirming the order of the Central Road Traffic Board was also void.
In order to appreciate the contention that the appeal to the Central Road Traffic Board is incompetent, it is necessary to state a few relevant facts. The appellants, two in number, were running buses along the route Kurnool-Atmakur from the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.