SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 267

(1953) 2 MLJ 524 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : Mr.P.V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice.
Case Number(s) : C.R.P.No.634 of 1952.
Judgement Date : Thursday 27th of August 1953
Turlapati Venkateswara Rao .....Appellant(s)
Versus
The Municipal Council, Masulipatnam, represented by the Commissioner, Masulipatnam Municipality and others .....Respondent(s)

Advocates:
V. Parthasarathi for Petitioner.
S. Ramamurthy for the Government Pleader (P. Satyanarayana Raju) for 1st Respondent.

Order.-

This Civil Revision Petition involves a question of court-fee. The petitioners filed a suit in a representative capacity on behalf of the citizens and rate-payers of the Masulipatnam Municipality for a declaration that a resolution passed by the Municipal Council and all that was done in pursuance thereof were illegal ultra vires and void. There was also a prayer for an injunction restrain ing the Municipal Council from acting any further in pursuance of the said resolution.

I am of opinion that the suit clearly falls under Article 17-B of Schedule II of the Court-Fees Act. The learned Subordinate Judge, however, was of opinion mat as the declaration asked for was in respect of a resolution which related to the market the subject-matter in dispute should be deemed to be the market whose valuation was about Rs.7 lakhs. In his view therefore the proper article applicable was Article 17-A(1) of Schedule II of the Court-Fees Act, and as the value of the market was over Rs.10,000 the proper court-fee was Rs.500. The plaintiffs had paid only a sum of Rs.100.

The learned Judge was wrong in considering that the subject-matter of the suit was the market. The subject-matter of the suit was the resolution whose validity was being impeached. No doubt the resolution related to the market, but that would not make it the subject-matter of the suit. The petitioner has paid sufficient court-fee, viz., Rs.100 under Article 17-B of Schedule II of Court-Fees Act, which as already mentioned applies.

The Civil Revision Petition is allowed. There will be no order as to costs.

R.M. ----- Petition allowed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top