SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 354

G.RAJASURIA
Lakshmanan – Appellant
Versus
G. Ayyasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:V. Bhiman, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

1. These second appeals are filed by the defendants, inveighing the judgement and decree dated dated 30.10.2006 passed by the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, in A.S.No.106 of 2006 and in the cross appeal, reversing the judgment and decree dated 3.1.2006 passed by the III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore, in O.S.No.611 of 2002, which was filed seeking permanent and mandatory injunction.

2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. Compendiously and concisely, the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of these second appeals would run thus: (a) The respondent herein, as plaintiff, has filed the suit seeking the following reliefs: "to pass a judgement and decree against the defendant; a) Restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants in anyway disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiff encroaching or any manner by means of permanent injunction. b) directing the defendants to remove the three windows and the eaves of the tiled roof projection towards the suit property situa













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top