SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 187

High Court of Judicature at Madras
M. JAICHANDREN
M/S. Sree Rajendra Textiles Rep. By Its Parnter: Amarish
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner Of Customs
Writ Petition No.604 of 2011
Decided on : 12-01-2011

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Jayachandran, Advocate.
For the Respondent: S. Uthayakumar, S.C.G.S.C.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the release of goods under the Customs Act is subject to specified conditions, including payment of duty, bank guarantee, and completion of the adjudication process.

Headnote:

Customs Act - Release of Goods - The court directed the respondent to release the goods subject to certain conditions, including payment of duty and providing bank guarantee and personal bond.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the release of goods, and the court directed the respondent to release the goods subject to specified conditions.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondent to release the goods subject to conditions related to payment of duty, bank guarantee, and personal bond, and completion of the adjudication process within a specified period.

Issues: Release of goods, payment of duty, bank guarantee, personal bond, and completion of adjudication process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of the Customs Act, which required the petitioner to pay the entire amount of duty, provide a bank guarantee, and furnish a personal bond for the release of goods.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to release the goods subject to specified conditions related to payment of duty, bank guarantee, and personal bond, and completion of the adjudication process within a specified period. The connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 was closed with no costs.

JUDGMENT :-

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the issues involved in this writ petition is covered by the order of this Court, dated 29.12.2010, in W.P.Nos.30153 and 30154 of 2010, wherein, this Court had directed the respondent therein to release the goods concerned subject to certain conditions.

3. The learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court following its earlier order, dated 29.12.2010.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned and in view of the order passed by this Court, on 29.12.2010, in W.P.Nos.30153 and 30154 of 2010, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent to release the goods concerned subject to the following conditions:

(1) The petitioner shall pay the entire amount of duty, as per the declared value, which may be based on the contract or price etc., as per the provisions of the Customs Act, forthwith, to the Department.

(2) In addition, the petitioner shall provide sufficient bank guarantee, to the satisfaction of the respondent, drawn on any Nationalised bank, in respect of 50% of the difference in duty, in favour of the Department, to be kept alive till the adjudication process is completed.

(3) In respect of the remaining 50% of the difference in duty, the petitioner shall furnish personal bond to the satisfaction of the respondent. On completion of all the three conditions, the respondent shall release the goods.

(4) On release of the goods in question on compliance with the said conditions, the respondents shall complete the adjudication process, within a period of four weeks thereafter, by giving a necessary show cause notice. It is made clear that on furnishing of necessary show cause notice, the petitioner shall submit their objections, appear before the respondent and co-operate with the Department in the adjudication process."

Connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed. No costs.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top