R.S.RAMANATHAN
Rayathal (died) – Appellant
Versus
Periya Kannu – Respondent
1. Defendants 2 to 6 in O.S.No.316 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif, Palladam are the revision petitioners.
2. Defendants 2 to 6/revision petitioners herein filed the above revision for rejection of the plaint. It is submitted by Mr.Raghavachari, learned counsel for the revision petitioners that the respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration that they are the absolute owners of the suit property and for consequential injunction restraining the revision petitioners from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property and to declare that the order passed by the District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore dated 25.6.2007 and confirmed by the Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chennai dated 7.1.2009 in respect of the suit property is against law and for mandatory injunction to keep the revenue records in the name of the plaintiff.
3. According to Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel for the petitioners that insofar as the first relief is concerned, the suit is maintainable but, insofar as the second relief is concerned, it is barred by section 14 of the Patta Pass Book Act and therefore, the suit has to be rejected in respect of the second
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.