SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 178

S.PALANIVELU
Vasantha Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Gunasekaran – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:
For the Petitioner:R. Gururaj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Subramanian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1 This Revision has been filed against the order dated 23.6.2009 passed in I.A. No. 1524 of 2008 in O.S. No. 576 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

2 The petitioner is the defendant in O.S. No. 576 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. This is a suit for partition filed by the respondent. Pending the trial of the suit, the respondent/plaintiff produced unstamped and unregistered release deed dated 24.9.1991 executed by the respondent in favour of his sister by name Anusuya Amma along with an application to impound the same by referring to the Deputy Collector (Stamps) for Collection of Stamp Duty and Penalty. The petitioner has filed a memo praying the Court to sent the document to the Deputy Collector Stamps and the memo was dismissed by the Court as against which she preferred C.R.P. No. 2549 of 2007 before this Court, in which a direction was issued to her to file an application for the said purpose and consequently, the petitioner has filed the petition to impound the said document.

3 In the counter filed by the respondent in I.A. No. 1524 of 2008, it has been stated that it is false to allege that
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top