SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 982

R.MALA
Jubaida Ummal – Appellant
Versus
S. Abdul Azees – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:
For the Appellant:T.P. Manoharan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Sounthar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. This appeal has been arising out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.27 of 2006, dated 28.09.2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Puducherry at Karaikal.

2. The averments made in the plaint in O.S.No.27 of 2006 are as follows:-

The defendant is the owner of the suit property. She borrowed a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-from the plaintiff and executed a simple mortgage deed on 24.07.2002, which was duly executed, attested and registered. The defendant has undertook to repay the same with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. On 25.07.2003, the defendant made a part payment of Rs.40,000/- towards principal and interest and a receipt was also issued by the plaintiff for the same. Except this amount, the defendant has not paid any other amount. In spite of various demands, the defendant has failed to repay the balance amount and discharged the mortgage. Hence, the plaintiff issued a legal notice on 13.05.2004 calling upon the defendant to repay the balance amount. The defendant received the said notice on 15.05.2004, but she neither sent a reply, nor repaid the balance amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of money due on










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top