SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 872

K.VENKATARAMAN
R. Balaji – Appellant
Versus
V. Vijayan – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:
For the Petitioner:D. Rajendran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:L.K. Manjunath, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.32 of 2008 before the learned Principal District Munsif, Ambur, aggrieved over the order dated 10.8.2010 passed by the said Court in allowing the application in I.A.No.65 of 2010 preferred by the respondents to amend the written statement, has come up with the present civil revision petition.

2. The respondents being defendants in the said suit, have filed an application in I.A.No.65 of 2010 for amendment of the written statement. The amendment that has been sought for by the respondents is only in respect of the boundaries set out in the written statement. The Court below found that the said amendment will not change the cause of action or the nature of the suit property and that it will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner and allowed the said application. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with the present civil revision petition.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner strenuously contended that in a mechanical way, the respondents herein have filed the said application for amendment in the written statement and the same should not have been allowed by the Court below. However, I am of the considered view that the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top