K.VENKATARAMAN
R. Balaji – Appellant
Versus
V. Vijayan – Respondent
1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.32 of 2008 before the learned Principal District Munsif, Ambur, aggrieved over the order dated 10.8.2010 passed by the said Court in allowing the application in I.A.No.65 of 2010 preferred by the respondents to amend the written statement, has come up with the present civil revision petition.
2. The respondents being defendants in the said suit, have filed an application in I.A.No.65 of 2010 for amendment of the written statement. The amendment that has been sought for by the respondents is only in respect of the boundaries set out in the written statement. The Court below found that the said amendment will not change the cause of action or the nature of the suit property and that it will not cause any prejudice to the petitioner and allowed the said application. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with the present civil revision petition.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner strenuously contended that in a mechanical way, the respondents herein have filed the said application for amendment in the written statement and the same should not have been allowed by the Court below. However, I am of the considered view that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.