G.RAJASURIA
Rahimunnisabi – Appellant
Versus
Subhan Sahib – Respondent
1. This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2004 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram in A.S.No.95 of 2003 confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2002 passed by the learned II Additional District Munsif, Tirukoilur, Villupuram District in O.S.No.26 of 1998.
2. The parties are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.
3. The epitome and the long and short of the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:
a] The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession of the "B" Scheduled property found set out in the plaint.
b] The third defendant filed the written statement resisting the suit and it was adopted by D1 and D2.
c] Whereupon issues were framed. On the side of the plaintiff, the plaintiff examined herself as P.W.1 and Exs.A1 to A8 were marked. The first defendant/Subhan Sahib examined himself as D.W.1 along with D.W2 and marked Exs.B1 to B17 and the Court documents Exs.C1 to C3.
d] Ultimately the trial court dismissed the suit, as against which, appeal was file
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.