R.BANUMATHI, M.M.SUNDRESH
A. N. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Arulmighu Arunachaleswarar Devasthanam Thiruvannamalai, rep. by its Executive Officer – Respondent
R. BANUMATHI.,J.
1. These appeals arise out of the common Judgment of the learned single Judge in C.S.No.1486 of 1988 and Tr.C.S.No.847 of 1993 dated 14.2.2001, whereby the learned single Judge decreed the suit filed by the Plaintiff Devasthanam directing the Defendants to quit and deliver the vacant possession and declining to grant the relief specific performance as prayed by the Defendant-A.N.Kumar. Since the points for determination in both the appeals are one and same, both the appeals were taken up together and disposed of by this Common Judgment. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per their array in Civil Suit No.1486 of 1988 filed before this Court.
2. Case of Plaintiff-Devasthanam is that Plaintiff is the owner of the property measuring about 64 grounds in S.No.41, Sri Arunachalampuram in the village of Urur, erstwhile Saidapet Taluk. According to Plaintiff-Devasthanam, the said 64 grounds was leased to one A.Ranaganatha Mudaliar under lease deed dated 24.02.1937 for a period of 50 years on a monthly rent at the rate of Rs.40/-. As per the lease, the lessee was permitted to erect buildings and superstructures over the property. Further case of Plaint
1. NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES LTD. VS. HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION
3. RAMESH GOBLNDRAM Vs. SUGRA HUMAYUN MIRZA WAKF
4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. MANJETI LAXMI KANTHA RAO
2. RAJASTHAN SRTC VS. BAL MUKUND BAIRWA(2) ((2009) 4 SCC 299)
5. B.SHAJI VS. SREE PRAVARASWAMY DEVASTHANAM
7. T.S.BALIAH VS. I.T.O. (AIR 1969 SC 701)
8. SRI VEDAGIRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMI TEMPLE V. INDURU PATTABNIRAMI REDDI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.